Firefox market share vs Mozilla Foundation chair salary for last year financials are available (2018)
@a_cat #mozilla is in the position of being too big and vulnerable to actually fight for their users... but browser specs (and, necessarily, implementations) are so mindbogglingly complex that as a browser vendor one can't be *that* small in the first place
I'm not going to say this is the point of Google pushing web standards "forward" into more complexity, but this is a very convenient situation for Google
I think the only way to actually change this status quo would be for some relatively well-funded (5-20 fulltime devs) to approach browser development as the construction of adversarial tools for manipulating web page data, rather than the task of implementing web standards as specified, and they'd need all the technical leverage they could get... cannibalizing #servo could be a start
@migratory @a_cat mozilla/netscape has been in the business of pushing their own crappy tech and turning it into de facto standards before google even existed. they’ve never really been the “good guys”. they’re in large part responsible for the sorry state the web is in today.
it doesn’t really matter if there’s one, two or three of these companies in charge of web technology. users will lose either way.
@a_cat Nobody is wasting time on Pocket: Mozilla bought it, team remains the same. Also, Firefox is > 3% market share.
This doesn’t invalidate the other (sad) informations.
@a_cat nothing new under the Sun, unfortunately https://cooleypubco.com/2016/07/25/new-study-shows-inverse-correlation-between-ceo-pay-and-performance-over-the-long-term/
Mi skribis, ke mi ne konsentas kun tiu vidpunkto.
Ekonomio jes havas sian parton, ankau stulta gvidado. Sed kial la situacio de Mozilla iĝis tiel, ke ĝi estas tiel facila rompita?
Mi pensas ke la interna komplekso de TTT-teknologioj havas sian grandan parton.
put it on the pizza